Tuesday, October 13, 2015

Essay on "Oration on the Dignity of Man"

I'm posting my essay on this wonderful essay by Pico Della Mirandola. It was an assignment for my class at WGU.

Essay on “Oration On The Dignity Of Man”

Morris Buel


Requirement A:
1) Describe your initial thoughts and/or feelings about the work.
The author is trying to describe man’s place in the universe with the newly found rational thinking of the Renaissance era. In the first paragraph, Pico Della Mirandola sets up the framework of our creation, and mankind's intermediary place between the lower creatures and gods. His second paragraph details God’s work prior to the creation of man. It also gives the reader the first inkling as to the reason God created man. Only man can appreciate God’s creation, and praise God. The third paragraph describes our dominion over the lower order- other animals. It details our ability to degrade ourselves into a lower form (living like beasts or plants) or to use our intellect and judgment to be reborn in a higher form (the divine). The fourth through the sixth paragraph get to the heart of the author’s intent in this piece: that to distance ourselves from intellectualism and the praising of God is akin to being a plant or an animal. According to Mirandola the correct state of man is to be intellectual. We must disdain our Earthly desires that drag us down to lower states, and despise those things of heave that pull us out of the world. The greatest glory to God is using our mind for his glory.

2) Describe in Detail at least one aspect of the work that most interests you
One aspect of this work that interests me is how Mirandola weaves together faith and intellectualism. It’s clear to me that many of his ideas helped build the themes we see in the next era, the Enlightenment. He weaves a subtle hint of deism in his work while still tantalizing the reader with the more spiritual themes of the Renaissance.

B. Analyze the work
1) Describe the Historical Context of the period in which the work was written:
The Renaissance was the rise of intellectualism and the rebirth of purely intellectual pursuits. It was the era that allowed men to question theocracy, and rewarded Mirandola’s intellectual curiosity.

Pico Della Mirandola is thought of as a key figure in the Italian Renaissance:
Pico’s Oration attempted to remap the human landscape to center all attention on human capacity and human perspective. Arriving in a place near Florence, this famous Renaissance philosopher taught the amazing capacity of human achievement. "Pico himself had a massive intellect and studied everything there was to be studied in the university curriculum of the Renaissance; the Oration in part is meant to be a preface to a massive compendium of all the intellectual achievements of humanity, a compendium that never appeared because of Pico's early death."  (http://public.wsu.edu/~brians/world_civ/worldcivreader/world_civ_reader_1/pico.html)

2) Describe insights into the work can be gained from the author’s biography?
Mirandola believed the pursuit of intellectual philosopy was more noble than toil of common man. This idea that the philosopher is of higher importance in society is not one that Pico invented himself. Plato himself believed in the nobility of the philosopher to such a degree that he thought that they should rule over society. Unlike Plato though, Pico was also clearly influenced by the era of the Renaissance. Pico intertwined his Christian faith with philosophy of the classical world, and other theologies. According to the New World Encyclopedia (2015), “Pico became the first Christian scholar to use the theory of Kabbala in support of Christian thought.”

Mirandola was a thinker ahead of his time. His ideas would have been less radical during the Enlightenment, and therefore led to strife with the Catholic Church. He was challenged by the Church to recant several of his theses. Mirandola’s goal wasn’t to challenge the authority of the church but rather aspire to alter idea’s of spirituality. His intent was to try and prove that intellectual pursuits didn’t have to be at odds with Christianity- in fact they could enhance one’s faith. His ideas most likely influenced thinkers of later eras, who didn’t have to deal with a church hell bent on crushing intellect.

3) Analyze how this work explores a particular theme and/or stylistic characteristic from its period
One of the major themes of the Renaissance was the rebirth of Classicism. A primary classical theme was one of balance. In Mirandola’s work, you can see the idea of balance in the outcome of his worldview. One shouldn’t be too focused on Earthly things, as it will degrade you into a plant or an animal. Likewise, one shouldn’t be too focused on the spiritual things as you’ll be unable to relate to your fellow man. Like many other Christian philosophers of the day, Mirandola embraced classical and secular knowledge. He believed we could learn the truth from many theological and cultural origins.

There is also a deep sense of intellectualism in the piece. In order to achieve the balance he speaks of, you have to refine your intellect. At the heart of intellectualism in the “oration” is the balance one must achieve between free will and moral restraint. As Pico says in his essay; “Above all, we should not make that freedom of choice God gave us into something harmful, for it was intended to be our advantage.” (Oration On the Dignity Of Man, Pico Della Mirandola) This sense of balance was clearly from a deeply studied Christian as well. “As free, and not using your liberty for a cloke of maliciousness, but as the servants of God.” (1 Peter 2:16, KJV New Testament)
4) Explain the relevance of this work for today’s audiences

I feel this piece is extremely relevant in today’s age as many people have abandoned the ideals of sacred spirituality and intellectual enlightenment. It’s clear many of our founders were also influenced by these eternal ideas of balance. The intellectuals that abandoned the ideals of sacred spirituality, abandoned ideals of human dignity as well. Margaret Sanger, was a great intellect, but because of her gross abandonment of that which is sacred, she promoted that some people were of better “stock” and worthy of propagating the species. (quote below)

In a 1921 article in the Birth Control Review, Sanger wrote, "The most urgent problem today is how to limit and discourage the over-fertility of the mentally and physically defective." Reviewers of one of her 1919 articles interpreted her objectives as "More children from the fit, less from the unfit." Again, the question of who decides fitness is important, and it was an issue that Sanger only partly addressed. "The undeniably feebleminded should indeed, not only be discouraged but prevented from propagating their kind," she wrote.
(http://www.blackgenocide.org/sanger05.html, quoting from an article in Citizen Magazine January 20th, 1992 edition)
Unfortunately, following our hearts desire to be purely spiritual is also frought with peril. Such people, are more likely to be led astray by cults of personality. Jim Jones, the Mooney cult and others have all preyed upon our spiritual nature to control people. Without using our intellectual capacity, we easily fall prey to those who would enslave us with our spiritual nature. The idea of balance is still extremely important and relevant in today’s world.  In the words of Thomas Jefferson who was clearly influenced by Pico, ”Question with boldness even the existence of a god; because, if there be one, he must more approve the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear.” (Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Peter Carr, 1787 - https://www.monticello.org/site/research-and-collections/jeffersons-religious-beliefs)

C. Reflect on how the analysis affected your perception of the work
1) Discuss how the deeper knowledge you gained through your analysis has informed or altered your thoughts and/or feelings

It’s interesting that my initial observations and feelings about this work, were pretty close to what other philosophers and intellectuals have determined his work to represent. Reading about his struggles after writing this piece, helped me appreciate the age in which we live where someone is not imprisoned (in America) for speaking their mind. As Isaac Newton, “I stand on the shoulders of giants”. Likewise there is a clear influence of the great enlightenment thinkers, Thomas Jefferson, John Locke, Thomas Paine and Alexis De Tocqueville that were all clearly influenced by Pico De Mirandola’s ideals of intellectual and spiritual balance. Likewise Pico was influenced by giants. From Aristotle to Moses and from Abraham to Plato, Pico was a greatly read intellectual and understood the importance of understanding human history to achieve greater reason and faith.

Reference Page

Online Study guide from WSU - http://public.wsu.edu/~brians/world_civ/worldcivreader/world_civ_reader_1/pico.html Summary from book authors describes Pico’s key history in the renaissance. The web page doesn’t make it clear which author makes this assertion.

Online New World Encyclopedia - Article on Pico Della Mirandola discusses his use of extra Christian sources to expand his Christian Philosophy into something new.

Oration on the Dignity of Man, Pico Della Mirandola - Quoted relevant part of oration

1 Peter from KJV New Testament - Quoted one verse to show Mirandola’s Christian roots in his philosophy.

Quoted article from Citizen Magazine posted on blackgenocide.org, no author name posted - This block quote was to show the relevance of Pico’s classical ideas of balance.

Quoted Thomas Jefferson’s letter - Shows that Thomas Jefferson felt intellectualism was better than blind faith.

Saturday, January 24, 2015

Utopian Central Planning Always Leads to Misery

Utopian Central Planning Always Fails.

Here we are once again with two or three stories merging together at the same time to reveal the inner workings of utopian statism.  In one corner we have a doctor in the UK admitting that they are going bankrupt and are going to have to privatize Health Care.  In the other corner we have a new study from the Danes showing that they aren't in fact all that happy, and their utopian statist experiment is going down faster than the Hindenburg.  In a third corner we have the UK admitting they use a "death test".  This is basically a kind way of saying, you aren't worth serving health care too.

The left is of course either ignoring these stories, or in the case of the latter using their typical tourette syndrome tactics.  The New York Post is owned by Rupert Murdoch who own Faux News!  This study is bunk, just because they drink excessively all the time doesn't mean they are unhappy!

Both of these stories share some common points

Liberals are immoral

The state cannot make you happy when it has to steal from another person's life force to provide you
the goods and services you refuse to supply for yourself.  The whole point of liberty is that two actions lead to drastically different results.  The person who makes bad choices then becomes unhappy and chooses to change their lives to seek out the right choices to find their happiness.  That's the whole, pursuit of happiness.  Free will to find what makes you happy, that doesn't involve stealing or hurting from someone else.  That's the whole moral problem with utopian statism.  In order to "help" one person you have to steal from someone else.  You are costing one person's happiness in order to help another.  Statism is inherently immoral.  Our founders recognized this and thusly called their newly formed constitutional republic a necessary evil.  Too little government is just as dangerous as too much government.  Prosperity requires a stable civil society that respects natural law and private property.  All too often anarchic societies degrade into micro tyranny.  Might makes right, as nature abhors a vacuum of power.

Liberals have too much hubris

The state will never have enough information to successfully plan our lives from the top down.  Utopian statism believes that the state through smart enough planning can short circuit natural law.  It's never happened and never will.  The central planners will never have enough information.  This is a symptom of too much hubris in the liberal mind.  They truly believe they can run your life better than you can run your own life.  It doesn't matter that their countless attempts at tinkering with society have led to misery.  From the minimum wage causing 25% unemployment amongst the youth, to toilet paper shortages in Venezuela.  It doesn't matter what is being planned and where it's being planned, central planning will fail and collapse on itself.  It's also happened here in America in other ways.  Nixon set a price cap on gasoline.  The result?  Gas lines.  FDR decided he knew better than the market, as to what the farmer should make.  The result?  Food lines.  The central planner will always make life worse.

How do we reverse course from socialism?

In order to get back to the center, it's going to take enormous moral fortitude.  Many people will not willingly abandon the failed ideas of utopian statism (aka socialism, marxism, communist, etc). Even though they are standing in line for that "free" product or service, they see it as a RIGHT.  That's the other moral problem of socialism.  The statist steals from one man (the first moral wrong), to give to the other person (the second moral wrong). People become twisted versions of humanity that demand other people labor in exchange, we the working few who remain get Government's boot against our head.  Without a moral base, it's impossible to ever really abandon the failed ideas of socialism.  It's why I believe we will continue along the Tytler cycle, and the ultimate downfall of America.

Wednesday, September 17, 2014

Thursday, September 4, 2014

Were Unions Ever Necessary Part Two

There are many myths out there that have been built up into the general psyche.  One of them is that even though, unions aren't necessary today, there was one point in industrialization where they were, to protect us from the robber baron.  Another myth is that the robber barons, would've just kept all the money for themselves, and created monopolies to charge what they wanted.  I will be debunking both of these myths.

These lies are pervasive and has been built up by the unions.  They've rewritten history to try and change the future.  Unions were (and largely still are) throw backs to mercantilism - they seek crony protectionism, to protect the tradesmen from competition, and harm both the producer and the consumer. They are in fact enemies of free market capitalism.  During the Industrial Revolution, people could suddenly gain skills and money without belonging to a trade union.  The trade unions responded to this threat with lies.  That the immigrants (legal at the time) we're stealing jobs.  That the minorities were stealing jobs.  The Marxist agitators latched onto this myth machine and started espousing that the great business men, were in face "Robber Barons."

They built up the big lie about the "Robber Barons"- people being abused by them, and them abusing other businesses.  Upton Sinclair, gladly played the useful idiot for the unions with his anti capitalist book, "The Jungle".  He proclaimed that "Capitalism is a jungle.", it's every man for himself.  Capitalism in fact is the very opposite of a jungle, and is the very highest form of voluntary cooperation.  Capitalism and free trade, and the ability to change our careers during a lifetime (something unions don't want!) is what separates us from the jungle.  We are capable of shaping our world, and voluntarily cooperating with other people that we would otherwise not get along with.

One of the most brilliant arguments for free market capitalism, is the poem, "I Am Pencil."  Watch this version below;

Milton Friedman also brilliantly debunks the Robber Barons, in this piece;

In the end, capitalism provides choice and liberty, unions take away choice and liberty.  You can re-read my part 1 of this topic here.  I started with a picture of a marxist occupier, many probably won't understand the connection.  The connection, is obvious if you think about it.  Unions today proclaim a job is a right, and you deserve a minimum wage.

You don't  DESERVE anything.  You have to earn, everything.  Capitalism does work, it's the system most compatible with human nature.  The reason why, is it's God's law.  Private property, and human interaction is what God wants.  He wants you to specialize, and then change to what other people need.

Wednesday, September 3, 2014

Short Story Hour Part 1

Monster Hunter

    I arrived early morning at the entrance to the city of Purlinska. The Sun had just begun to shine over the furthest mountain peak. It looked like it was going to be a warm autumn day. As I walked through the town toward my destination of the Chapel, I noticed the townspeople averting their gaze from me.  It did not matter much to me though, most Monster Hunters, were hated in any part of the world.  I approached the front of the chapel, cliche as chapels go, with a quaint little graveyard behind it.  I walked up to the wide double doors and pushed them inwards.  Few people inside near the back had their hands clasped together, and heads bowed.  At the front of the chapel was the Father.  I walked towards him and let the doors swing shut behind me.

As I drew nearer to him, he looked up at me then asked, “Are you seeking God my son?”
I replied in cold tone, “No Father.” Then added, “I’m here for the same reason you are.”
He smiled starkly, then replied, “I suppose I should have known you were the Hunter we sent for.”  He gave me a once over then added, “Come, follow me I’ll discuss the details of your job.”

    He left the pulpit and started heading towards his chamber. I followed him, and then walked in as he held the door open for me. He closed the door and went to sit behind his desk, his black robes swaying as he walked.
“Please sit down,” he said gesturing towards the seat on the other side of the desk.
I obliged him, sitting in the hard wicker chair across from him. “So what are the details of this job?” I queried him.
The father furrowed his brow together. “I guess introductions are out of the question?”
I smiled at him. “Names are too formal for the work I do.”
“Well then, shall we discuss why your here?” The father replied hastily, shuffling paperwork on his desk.
“By all means.” I replied, urging him to continue.
The father stood up and walked up to face the window, his robes brushing against the wicker chair as he moved. “Well this quiet town has a horrifying secret…” He started.
“On the night of Hallows Eve, the dead rise from their tombs and devour the living.” He turned deliberately to see my response.

My face as stone cold.remained statuesque.  As a Monster Hunter I had become used to these ‘strange’ happenings.  It seems lately they were increasing in frequency.  In my mind it was abnormal to cling on to the old world.  Sanity and normality had been vanquished by the creatures that go bump in the night.

“When will I receive payment?” I asked him before he could continue.
“After you stop the zombies. Find out what is causing them to awaken.” The Father replied to me.
I smiled, and stood up.. “ I’ll take the job and find the source of your zombies.” After replying bluntly, I got up and strided out of the room, and towards the exit of the Church.

    I figured the best way to find out the source of the zombies was to sit in the graveyard in a hidden place to see if I could see anything suspicious.  There was something off about the father, that raised my suspicions, that I’d be dealing with more than just the normal supernatual Zombie.  After nightfall, I snuck into the graveyard, hiding behind a large bush that was next to a mausoleum.  Seconds quickly turned into minutes, and minutes quickly turned into hours.  I was about to abandon my post, when I heard someone talking.  Either, this church has the first ever talking Zombie, or something more sinister was going on.  The sound become more guttural, than human, almost sounding like some sort of rhythmic chanting. I tried getting a better look through the bushes. It looked like the Father, I had spoken to earlier was out with some young clergyman, reading from a book.

I stood up and said, “Well Father what a surprise.”

As he turned towards me, it was almost like his eyes and mouth were writhing like a livnig thing.  He finished facing me, revealing a face flickering in the light of the fire, twisted like the gnarled branches of an old tree.  It took only a moment to realize that, either the Father was some sort of demon, or this wasn't the Father.

He looked up at me snarling angrily, “You fool, what are you doing here!”
I pointed at him and replied, “looking for your zombies.”
“So what are you doing here in the graveyard then?” he asked me.

At this point I was about to point out the obvious nature of zombies hanging out in graveyards, that was until a hand popped out of the grave close to my feet, reaching for me!  It took only another heartbeat for the creatures decayed head to emerge from the grave.  I started to back up to get some room to get my weapons ready, when I heard the ground behind me shift.  Shit.  They were everywhere.  I lunged backwards and tumbled right over a gravestone, into an empty grave.

“GROUAH!”, one of the two zombies screeched.

An eternity passed as my heart beat faster.

Another eternity passed, my heart speeding up.

The father's head poked over the top of the grave.

“GUAAHHH!!” I screamed.  He smiled even more impishly than should be possible, his face writhing in the light.

Tuesday, September 2, 2014

Social Justice Part III

First read my prior works in this series - Social Justice Part I, and Social Justice Part II.

In my two prior pieces on social justice, I discussed how such ideas are antithetical to Judeo-Christian values.  In this piece I'm going to talk about the results of those good intentions.  Repeated failures that are continually ignored by the Utopian left as they shove their fantasy down our throats.

Interestingly, when society ignores the bible's values on private property rights, and admonitions against theft, (taxation is theft) the society begins to crumble.  America has recent experience with such failures.  The Plymouth colony, that William Bradford founded started with _no_ private property rights.  It was all communal.  He like modern day social justice, anti property rights Christians, misunderstood the Bible and Christ.  Ask an obvious question, if God wanted us to live with no property rights, shouldn't natural law support such behavior?  If God wanted us to have communal property and to be interchangeable bricks in the wall, wouldn't such behavior succeed in reality?

When societies reject Private Property over the "common good", the result is abundance of misery and despair.  Is that what God wants?  for everyone in society to suffer?  If Bradford's experiment in rejecting Private Property was alone, it'd be easy to say, "We just need the right person to lead our centrally planned society!".  Who is that right person?  Why are you so quick to abandon the personal sovereignty that God granted you?  The uneducated masses always forget history, and are always rife to repeat it.

These people are waiting in line for toilet paper! Go Socialism!
Venezuela has decided to chase after Utopia.  They've abandoned property rights- now they can't get
enough toilet paper to clean up the mess they've created.  They've abandoned individual sovereignty - as a direct result crime towards other men and women is on the rise.  All of this makes sense, from a biblical world view.  When you reject the moral value of private property, people also abandond common decency toward others.  The civil society breaks down, as it's replaced with stealing and looting and raping others.

That's always the end result of Social Justice.  The natural world and natural law backs up God's words in the bible. He didn't want you to be envious of the rich, to have Government steal their wealth.  It's amazing to me, even the Pope buys into this marxist agitprop. Christ, clearly states; "There will always be poor people.".  Do you believe the bible is the word of God or not, you social justice espousing Jews and Christians?  Even for those that don't believe in the bible, natural law shows that their theories of humanity don't work.  They lead to misery and poverty.  Capitalism, especially the maligned "unbridled" capitalism, lead to great advancements in human interaction with one another.

There's nothing greater than the voluntary interaction between two people in capitalism.  Between the baker and the customer.  Between the fry cook and his or her customer.  Voluntary interactions bring together people that probably ordinarily hate one another.  That's the system the left wants to destroy?