More proof that liberalism is a mental disorder

UPDATE: Decided to filter the language from the liberal

The following is from a dangerously brain dead liberal on youtube, who believes 9/11 is a conspiracy theory.

Government fooled IDIOT

First of all muther f***er im AMERICAN!, don't tell me what to believe and not to believe, im a TRUTHER, its not a f***ing conspiracy its the TRUTH. idiots like you are fooled and brain washed by the government*, its so funny because the GOV. can come kill you and your family** and you would think it was a terriost attack on the U.S. your the MORAN who dose not think out side the f***in box. LEARN TO GROW SOME FREAKIN HAIR ON YOUR BALL SACK.

So far be it for my better interest I sent a reply back to this brain dead liberal:

R

e: Government fooled IDIOT

...

Re: Government fooled IDIOT

First tell me what a MORAN is.

Are you talking about one of the many cities? Or are you talking about the Female Quidditch player in Harry Potter?

And way to go in answering my question btw.

1) You are an American who believes in a vast conspiracy (that would've had to have had thousands of players) where none of them spilled their beans on the issue.

2) Believing this absolutely evil act was committed by your own government you felt compelled to stay within this government? Didn't you fear for your life? Being a "Truther" and all, most likely the "Evil" government would come for you next to silence the truth.

Hell that's what happened in REAL evil despot countries! When Hitler was spreading propaganda, do you think he tolerated those who tried to tell the truth about what was going on? HELL NO. He locked them up with the Jews.

Do you think Stalin or Moussolini tolerated the truth? HELL NO.

What about Mao?

What do you think? Most of them TO THIS DAY, that try to speak out against China are sent to Labor camps in northern China where most of them DIE.

So again.

WHY ARE YOU STILL HERE, IF YOU BELIEVE IN THIS BULLS***?

And how is a Government that can't even handle Cash for Clunkers going to keep secret a massive cover up on the scale that you are talking about? IN every other way our government is inept at keeping secrets. Could Bush keep his interrogation techniques secret?

NOPE. They were leaked to the NYT the next day.

Could Bush keep his wire tapping of terrorists Secret?

NOPE. The plans were leaked to the NYT the next day.

So again.

WHERE ARE THE LEAKS?

Typical liberal. Use ad hominem and personal attack threats instead of dealing with the intellectual problems with your deluded theory.

Can't you accept that it was just a bunch of pissed off muslims? Do you believe the UK caused the tube bombing?

That Spain caused the train bombing?

Why can't you believe the crazy jihadist muslims are willing to kill everyone on Earth until we all worship Allah five times a day?

HELL if you did some HONEST OPEN MINDED searching on you tube, you just have to listen to THEIR OWN WORDS, to understand that they HATE YOU, and WILL KILL YOU for not believing in Allah.

Grow a pair indeed.

Why don't you learn to have an honest conversation and have a little self examination instead of just believing some crackpot in his basement.

BTW...
In case you haven't put two and two together, If Bush was TRULY as evil as you are making the case for (which I don't believe you do), WHY are you still here if you think your government is capable of such an atrocity? Why don't you move to Canada?) ....

The idiot who made this theory WOULD BE DEAD. Why would someone evil enough to kill 2997 people for his "war" stop at killing people there?

No despot in HISTORY has ever done that. Clearly that's a fatal flaw though.

YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND HISTORY.

YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND ISLAMIC JIHAD.

BTW,
If you aren't going to open your mind and do an honest intellectual attic cleaning the conversation ends here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BgQdZgojOFI

"What makes Allah happy? Allah is happy when the infidel is killed."

Any positively open minded person would've read this post and absorbed and stated;
"You are right.","Why haven't there been leaks?"
or;
"You are right.","Someone evil enough to murder 2997 citizens would have no problem murdering those who were speaking against him."

Sadly I should've known that logic never follows liberals:

Re: Government fooled IDIOT

and indeed that infidel is YOU***!!! you fucking Muslim, American or what ever you are mother f***er. your one of those book smart people who live by the book well i got news for you bitch, if you have no street creditability then you have nothing in life your are worth less and you should indeed commit suicide and take your jack ass off of this word hell i wish you were killed during 9/11 and i wish your mom and dad were burned alive on the top floor, and sent to hell, because they raised a illiterate MORAN! peace of s*** human like you.


Conspiracy or no conspiracy, but i due hope that one day your family gets so fucked by the U.S. Gov. that you will think back at this e-mail and say "man that guy was right", that day is coming, and i'm damn sure gonna look forward to it.

don't bother the reply button, your next reply will be Declined.

Vile hatred for someone that disagrees with them? Check.

Wishing for me to commit suicide? Check.

Wishing for my family to be killed? Check.

This guy is truly, truly nuts.

Maybe that's why he's so obsessed with hair on them?

* I also find this one funny. Me a small constitutional government advocate has been BRAINWASHED by the government. NOPE. I just recognize evil, unlike these moral relativists.

** Of course the only way to respond to the world closing in on your fragile box of logic is to lash out. But THIS particular mental illness with his statement here is important. If you TRULY believed the government at any time could kill you or your family and blame "terriosts(SIC)" WHY ARE YOU STILL HERE? You are either LYING about your belief or you are seriously screwed in the head.

*** Isn't interesting that someone who doesn't even BELIEVE that a bunch of pissed off muslims caused the 9/11 attacks thinks it's such an insult to label me as one?

Were unions ever necessary?

Today I'm asking another politically charged question. Were unions ever necessary to begin with?

Today a poll was released that now 46% of people today think unions mostly hurt labor relations, and 45% of respondents think that they help labor relations. This is the lowest numbers that unions have EVER had. Which I think makes it the ideal time to ask if unions were EVER necessary to help job conditions. Like the minimum wage, I think that it only hinders your ability to market your abilities to your boss, and to move up within the company. In union jobs you will never get into management, because management is not unionized.

At all the NON-Union shops today and yesterday people start at the bottom, work their ass off and end up becoming the assistant managers, managers and even part owners of these shops. At Retail giants like Pier 1, more often than not the district managers are former associates who used to work the floor selling goods.

At union stores, like Fred Meyer and Safeway the employee gets screwed over for promotions, and more often than not they'll blame the store. What they fail to realize that it's the UNION that is holding them back!

Let's go back and look at why. In the early 1910's before there was a minimum wage, maids in New York were paid a nominal wage of $1.20 an hour. Ten years later there was a shift in education level and there weren't as many maids to choose from. Just ten years later, the nominal wage for a maid went up to $9.00 an hour.

That's the free market at work.

Unlike has been stated by pro-union advocates, MOST of the improvements in the working conditions and benefits given to employees has come about in the non-unionized fields. And this will continue to be the case after the recession ends.

Social Justice PT. II

More biblical proof that Social Justice and Socialism, Marxism, etc are unbiblical and ir-religious:

10th commandment:

Exodus 20:17 "Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that [is] thy neighbour's."

The FUNDAMENTALS of modern liberalism is to make people covet what their neighbors have. Their healthcare, their house, their cars, their beliefs, their family, their race, their sexuality, etc.

This view is ABSOLUTELY destructive to humanity and to our nation. If you talk to someone that covets another person's belonging's (AKA the 25% of country that falls into the FAR left) they are ABSOLUTELY unhinged. They have absolutely no grounding in reality, and just spout lies to continue their justification for covetous behavior.

Marx himself was a covetous man. He tried to create an uprising of the working man that they should covet their boss.

That their boss is a bastard for keeping the good life from the proletariat...

And today we have the Covet-or in Chief running the USA. The greatest crime in covetous behavior is theft.

They steal from those who have earned their lifestyle to "equalize" those who have earned nothing.

In the end it just proves that the mental gymnastic liberals put themselves through to justify their world view has made most of them insane.

Social Justice

I'm writing this in response to research I've recently done on Judaism that has brought up a sore spot that I encountered with liberal christians, (especially that moron Jim Wallis) the idea that Social Justice is the supreme will of God.

The problem with this viewpoint is that it FUNDAMENTALLY violates the 3rd commandment:

'You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain.'

Now, most people simply means that we shouldn't us God, in swearing... For instance stating "God Damn" would be the traditional viewpoint of violating this Commandment.

The fundamental problem with this point of view is that the punishment for simply using God's name wrong does not at all compare with the other nine commandments, like adultery, murder and covetous behavior. The only answer is that what this Commandment is talking about USING God for your own means. Look at the direct hebrew translation:


la-shav: To Vanity, this is obviously a reference to the self, the individual.

el-lo-hey-kha: the holy name of God

Et-Shem-Adonai: The Name of "God" (Adonai is the generic word for God)

Tis-Sa Lo: You shall not take.

So:

You shall not use the name of God for self glorification.

These individuals that promote social justice (AKA Marxism) are doing so in the name of God.

GOD wants you to PERSONALLY help the poor, not have the government redistribute wealth to them and enslave them in poverty.

Operating system shuffle

I have a question... is anyone out there TRULY happy with the operating system they are using? I've used probably 50 different Linux (along with the various window/desktop managers) all versions of windows and several versions of Mac.

They ALL have something in common. They all suck, ALL operating systems have inherent design flaws and problems because they are made with a vision of what the programmer finds acceptable design behavior.

This behavior doesn't work for the vast majority of us, and most Windows users just use it because they want their software they've purchased to continue to work. Most Mac users accept the horrible Apple design decisions because they think it makes them cool.

Linux users ignore the incessant annoyances of the system and the idiotic idealogy of the developers. (Like Mark Shuttleworth; who doesn't want to include proprietary software that makes the OS work because it's against his religion). And yes, I do think that Linux is a religion for some, far too many of you guys adopt completely anti-market and anti-capitalist view points that contradict the "it's about the competition".

For alot of these guys it's NOT about the competition but about FORCING their opinions onto other developers. Bill Gates is right about the GPL. It's viral and forces you to lisence your product the same way.

Do any of these new age collectivist view points HELP the end user? The first thing I had to do after installing Ubuntu was install the "restricted" files so that my computer was actually functional. And after clicking that I'm told that I'm installing: "ffmpeg-ugly","Mplayer-bad".

Force your opinions on the end user much Mark?

If he were alone it would be fine, but FAR FAR too many of you guys get absolutely religiously obsessed with "free" software to the point of making your product UNUSABLE.

No the answer to the obvious question. Why not use windows?

1) I got sick of the interface and design decisions there more so than Linux - Kde/Gnome.
2) I got sick of having to spend DAYS reinstalling the operating system when it fragged itself, or when some asshole virus writer fragged it.
3) I got sick of all the copyright bullshit. Yes I believe in copyrights, and developers SHOULD be paid fairly for their products. But just as the GNU-Collective is going off the deep end, SO TOO are alot of these developers who are re-working what fair-use means. Where is the happy middle ground? You know, if Apple approached the market like they had the opportunity to when they took BSD code to build their new OS, they had a chance to fundamentally change the idealogy in the marketplace by still selling a product but allowing the end user to use it the way THEY wanted to.

Democrats for Obama

Just stumbled across this blog I'm quite impressed that some democrats are seeing beyond their party lines and the importance of not electing the radical Obama.  For a taste of his radical roots, read this article posted here, here, and here.

Really with friends like Obama has made over the years, how can we believe anything he states? 

I welcome these democrats because they will make sure that there is no recount bullshit.

Blogged with the Flock Browser

Obama lies and the press plays cover for free

I can honestly not believe just how biased the press is being this cycle. They are taking statement from the Obama campaign without a shred of questioning, but when it comes to the McCain campaign, they take it through the shredder, then throw it in the fireplace, than take the ashes and put them down the garbage disposal.

Here's the latest example from an AP story today:

"You're hearing an awfully lot about me - most of which is not true - but you're not hearing a lot about you," Obama said. "You haven't heard a word about how we're going to deal with any aspect of the economy that is affecting you and your pocketbook day-to-day. Haven't heard a word about it. I'm not exaggerating. Literally, two nights, they have not said a word about it."

This is completely BS. EVERY speaker addressed the need to drill for more oil, have more nuclear and clean coal, and strive towards energy independence this is an issue that has directly affected American pocketbooks.

Both McCain and Palin, stressed the need to make government smaller, and to lower taxes. Look at the years prior to the Bush tax cut and how much people were paying to the government... that's been dramatically reduced already! Obama wants to repeal that though.

And they don't want to drill, explore nuclear options OR Clean coal.

Here's AP's response though:

The Illinois senator told voters that the GOP convention speakers are spending all their time talking about politics, not about issues that matter to voters. He criticized the Republicans for not addressing the economic distress or housing foreclosures that have grown during the Bush administration.

Complete BS. They addressed the main components of economic distress. Energy and tax burden.

The foreclosures are no more Bush's fault than the tech boom bubble bust was Clinton's fault.

"The notion that many questions about her work in Alaska is somehow not relevant to her potentially being vice president of the United States doesn't make too much sense to me," Obama said.

Her work in Alaska is completely relevant. HER FAMILY affairs however are not. She was a Mayor, you were a corrupt community organizer that gave the power to vote democrat to dead people. of course, maybe you actually do see dead people, like you stated in your speech on memorial day.

"I assume she wants to be treated the same way guys are treated, which means their records are under scrutiny. I've been through this for 19 months. She's been through this for, what, four days so far?""

You've been under scrutiny? ARE YOU SERIOUS? You would've never been selected as the top ticket if you were subject to the same scrutinous microscope they've placed Sarah Palin under.

It's just more of the same from the Obama campaign. Slander, lie and copy McCain's positions on foriegn policy.