Scandalzilla: Obama Administration's 3 Biggest Scandals

The list of scandals Obama is involved in should shock and dismay every American patriot.  Unfortunately the Democrats, have become hyper partisan, defending the imperialist actions of this lawless President.  I'm not going to go over every scandal, just the three big ones.  Why do they matter?

Liberty and integrity suffer if we allow this lawless President to go unpunished.

moonbattery.com

Fast and Furious: Full coverage on the story from the LA Times.  In fact, it's probably the best coverage I've seen and it's from a MSM source. This one of all the scandals, should have the left apoplectic.  For God's sake, they were giving criminals GUNS!!

Some of those guns, used against border patrol (townhall.com), and against our marines.

Obama, is worse than Nixon.  No one died from Nixon's imperial lying; (from the townhall.com article)

President Obama asserted executive privilege over Fast and Furious documents in June 2012 minutes before Attorney General Eric Holder was voted in contempt by the House Oversight Committee. 

Why would he assert such privilege if he wasn't involved in the conspiracy?


Benghazi attack: If the evidence against the administration, makes them look bad, this makes them look even worse. FROM THE BEGINNING, even the MSM challenged the official narrative;


From the Washington Post: (IN 2012)

 “I have seen that report, and the story is absolutely wrong. We were not aware of any actionable intelligence indicating that an attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi was planned or imminent.  That report is false.”
— Carney, news briefing, Sept. 1
“Well, you’re conveniently conflating two things, which is the anniversary of 9/11 and the incidents that took place, which are under investigation and the cause and motivation behind them will be decided by that investigation.”
— Carney, news briefing, Sept. 17
 “It is, I think, self-evident that what happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack. Our embassy was attacked violently, and the result was four deaths of American officials. So, again, that's self- evident.
“He also made clear that at this point, based on the information he has — and he is briefing the Hill on the most up-to-date intelligence — we have no information at this point that suggests that this was a significantly preplanned attack, but this was the result of opportunism, taking advantage of and exploiting what was happening as a result of reaction to the video that was found to be offensive.”
— Carney, news briefing, Sept. 20

From Fox News (Jan 2014)

Minutes after the American consulate in Benghazi came under assault on Sept. 11, 2012, the nation's top civilian and uniformed defense officials -- headed for a previously scheduled Oval Office session with President Obama -- were informed that the event was a "terrorist attack," declassified documents show. The new evidence raises the question of why the top military men, one of whom was a member of the president's Cabinet, allowed him and other senior Obama administration officials to press a false narrative of the Benghazi attacks for two weeks afterward. 

The most damning of all, is that Stevens asked for more security in Benghazi.

This all came out in 2012, and yet in 2013, McLatchey printed an article stating Stevens never asked for help (not linking to them, they don't deserve the clicks.)

It's amazing that there is not more outrage over this.  The administration, lied, covered up Steven's death, and covered up Al Qaeda.  ALL to get Obama re-elected.



IRS: Speaking of getting Obama re-elected, this was the cherry on top of the ice cream.  Targeting conservative and tea party groups to make it harder for them to fight Obama.

Where's the proof you say?

redacted, deleted and destroyed.

1) Email servers backup any emails sent from the local machine.  How likely is it that so many machines had hard drive problems at the same time?  How likely is it the servers lost their data?  The backups of those servers?  (which they conveniently stopped in 2012)

Nixon lost 18 minutes of tape and the media, and democrats lost their minds.

The IRS loses ENTIRE HARD DRIVES from the entire department that Louis Lerner worked in and we hear NOTHING?

2) Some of those emails were released and they are absolutely damning of Louis Lerner (and Obama).  Louis Lerner was just doing what Obama wanted.

At the very least Louis Lerner should be fired. AT THE VERY LEAST!

Conclusion: Any American who is not outraged at these three scandals, given the evidence against the administration is a useful idiot.

What scandals do you think I missed, that I should've talked about?

3 ways the Ferguson riots could've turned out differently.

Let's play a what if game.

1) What if the store owner that Michael Brown assaulted and robbed, was armed?

Answer) What if that store owner exercised his legal right of lethal self defense or his life and property?  A minority store owner, kills a minority robbing his store?  It wouldn't even hit the front page news.  Unfortunately, he got away with robbery, and was confronted by a white police officer.  It's a shame, that it wasn't one of the black police officers, because chances are, it would have ended the same for the thug Michael Brown.

2) What if the police officer that stopped Michael Brown was black instead of white?  Would there still be so much fomented faux outrage?

Answer) Would Michael Brown have assaulted a black officer?  I think he would've, he assaulted the minority store owner. The police officer, is assaulted in his car, Michael (or his cohort) slam the door on the officer, the officer gets out of his car, and demands the perp freeze.  Instead of LISTENING, to the officer, Michael turns around and charges the officer.

3) What if Michael had listened to the officer and NOT turned around?

Answer) He would have been arrested, instead the officer had to turn on his instinctual training and unloads his clip into the charging perp.  The damage to his eye socket, proves his life was in danger.

Conclusion:
The Saul Alinsky agitators, foment the faux outrage, and then get these black people to destroy their own community, FORCING the state to deploy force.

They then get the Alinksy meme's going that draw in the libertarians, like this picture here.  The force IS REQUIRED now, to keep the civil society in order.

What do you think would happen, if the state left a vacuum of power?

The city of Ferguson would be burned down and destroyed, and the cancerous anarchy would spread to other areas.  This is where I part ways with libertarians and anarchists.  Anarchy always leads to violence.
Might makes right.

Feel Good Philosophy Of Banning Things

People, get a bug up their butt to ban something they see as detrimental to society.  It could be drugs, it could be prostitution, or it could even be something as simple as a plastic bag.  As a free market capitalist, banning these things makes absolutely zero sense to me.  There are unintended consequences that sometimes override the supposed benefits of the feel good ban.

This utopian worldview and feel good philosophy has many unintended consequences.

So what are the unintended consequences of banning plastic bags?

First, increased crime:

The plastic bag ban has caused more crime.

Second, it causes increased disease

From the Article:
“A reusable grocery bag left in a hotel bathroom caused an outbreak of norovirus-induced diarrhea and nausea that struck nine of 13 members of a girls’ soccer team in October, Oregon researchers reported Wednesday.”

The free market and reality are going to make plastic bags, irregardless of your feel good policies trying to ban them and save the world.  Just like with drugs, banning something only increases demand and lowers the supply.  Just like with other items banned the unintended consequences end up worse than the problem they were trying to fix.

The data clearly shows the plastic bag ban is killing and hurting people.

It would also be extremely educational to understand how oil is cracked.  No matter what a refinery does today, they are going to end up with the material to make plastics.  It doesn't use less oil to ban bags, that poly material will be cracked no matter what.

This one is seriously under taught to our youth and politicians.  The question is what will the oil refineries do with that material?  Now that these dystopian mindsets are trying to make the world a better place by banning something that exists naturally as part of cracking a barrel of oil.

In conclusion, we would be well served to not so quickly ban something for the sake of trying to make the world a better place.  What can you do?  Get involved in local politics.  If the city you live in proposes banning plastic bags, present the facts to them.